DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Peabelilt** · 07-09-2012, 12:45 PM

So I say we're seeing the beginnings of a Golden Age, but that's hard to define. It means different things to different people. Here's what I propose:

A) This has been a very consistent, high quality year of tennis on the WTA.

B) The next four-ish years look extremely promising.

I am chaining myself to this tree until someone agrees with me.

I don't agree to the first point, seeing re: all the other posters in the thread commenting about the late stage beatdowns. But I'll agree to the second. I don't know if it'll become the new Golden Age, but it's certainly better than what it was like when Woz was on top. As long as the women's game can maintain this momentum and upward direction, we could be in for a Golden Age, but knowing women's tennis, we don't know when it's going to turn and eat a double bagel after being up 6-1 5-1 40-15.

07-09-2012, 12:45 PM	#26
Peabelilt Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 408 Senior Member	So I say we're seeing the beginnings of a Golden Age, but that's hard to define. It means different things to different people. Here's what I propose: A) This has been a very consistent, high quality year of tennis on the WTA. B) The next four-ish years look extremely promising. I am chaining myself to this tree until someone agrees with me. I don't agree to the first point, seeing re: all the other posters in the thread commenting about the late stage beatdowns. But I'll agree to the second. I don't know if it'll become the new Golden Age, but it's certainly better than what it was like when Woz was on top. As long as the women's game can maintain this momentum and upward direction, we could be in for a Golden Age, but knowing women's tennis, we don't know when it's going to turn and eat a double bagel after being up 6-1 5-1 40-15.
	Quote