DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**jagxj12** · 09-22-2012, 05:48 AM

Nole is 25, Nadal is 26.

Fed at 30 has not won a slam in almost two and a half years, so if we use that trajectory as an example, Nole still has two or three good shots at winning RG.

The interesting thing about Nadal is that despite the miles he has put on his legs, he remains as fast as ever. The first signs of Nadal fading will come not from his tennis skills diminishing but from him losing his foot speed.

Yes, but Roger has not been lucky with the following generation (Nadal, Nole and to some extent Murray) being very strong. Agassi had a lot more luck in this and kept winning slams in early 30-ties. Probably would have won another 2-3 without Federer around in 2004-2006.

As has been with Roger.

09-22-2012, 05:48 AM	#27
jagxj12 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 609 Senior Member	Nole is 25, Nadal is 26. Fed at 30 has not won a slam in almost two and a half years, so if we use that trajectory as an example, Nole still has two or three good shots at winning RG. The interesting thing about Nadal is that despite the miles he has put on his legs, he remains as fast as ever. The first signs of Nadal fading will come not from his tennis skills diminishing but from him losing his foot speed. Yes, but Roger has not been lucky with the following generation (Nadal, Nole and to some extent Murray) being very strong. Agassi had a lot more luck in this and kept winning slams in early 30-ties. Probably would have won another 2-3 without Federer around in 2004-2006. As has been with Roger.
	Quote