DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**encumeterz** · 09-06-2012, 11:45 AM

spurs turned down 40 million from chelsea last summer,since then hes signed a new 5 year deal so why would they accept 25 million?

They might not have a choice. He did sign a new contract before Chelsea came in, but clubs sometimes do that as an insurance policy to make more money. He'd cost us £25m plus £5m in add ons. That's quite a lot of money for a player still. I think Spurs need to realise that they aren't in the truly top bracket of English football, are only in the Europa League next season, and that their players might want to leave because of this. They could build a team again.

Springsteen, is it possible to red-rep you for posting something from that newspaper? >.>

Sure

Wasn't my fault though.

09-06-2012, 11:45 AM	#38
encumeterz Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 542 Senior Member	spurs turned down 40 million from chelsea last summer,since then hes signed a new 5 year deal so why would they accept 25 million? They might not have a choice. He did sign a new contract before Chelsea came in, but clubs sometimes do that as an insurance policy to make more money. He'd cost us £25m plus £5m in add ons. That's quite a lot of money for a player still. I think Spurs need to realise that they aren't in the truly top bracket of English football, are only in the Europa League next season, and that their players might want to leave because of this. They could build a team again. Springsteen, is it possible to red-rep you for posting something from that newspaper? >.> Sure Wasn't my fault though.
	Quote