[www.forumsovetov.ru]

Because he didn't allow the one goal? Sorry, but you guys still would've lost by two even if that one would've counted. I'm not disagreeing that it wasn't a goal, because it was, but the fact is that you all didn't play very well at all. Germany was simply better.

right then......england were totally shit,i agree.....there needs to be a huge injection of young legs

now to the germany game.....i'm sure most of the europeans on here will agree with what i'm going to explain,the football following ones anyway

germany's first goal,it was a freak.....you probably wont see another like it in top class football for a few years

the second goal....rank bad marking but a great finish

now then,england pulled a goal back,minutes later lampards shot hit the bar and went a yard over the line,it was one of the best finishes of the tournament...only the ref and his assistant went blind for a second and never saw it...now heres the crux....teams fail or succeed on such things.....if that goal had counted england were on the ascendency,we were the team on the up.....as it was we went into half time 2 - 1 down.....meaning that the longer we went in the second half without scoring the more risks we had to take....germany capitalised on this and hit us on the break twice..thing is..if it had been 2 - 2 the england side could have played a more controlled game......so it was an important decision which might just have changed the eventual outcome.