DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Aqgkvwzm** · 07-28-2009, 05:48 AM

I don't have a problem with Michael Vick being reinstated into the NFL. He did his time. It's a clean slate as far as I'm concerned, and I hope he finds a team.

It's not so much that I think Rose should have been banned permanently. But he was. That was the punishment. To go back on that and reinstate him would send the wrong message. It would be one more nail in the coffin of professional sport's reputation. The great and powerful athlete is more important than the rules or ethics.

07-28-2009, 05:48 AM	#7
Aqgkvwzm Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 482 Senior Member	I don't have a problem with Michael Vick being reinstated into the NFL. He did his time. It's a clean slate as far as I'm concerned, and I hope he finds a team. It's not so much that I think Rose should have been banned permanently. But he was. That was the punishment. To go back on that and reinstate him would send the wrong message. It would be one more nail in the coffin of professional sport's reputation. The great and powerful athlete is more important than the rules or ethics.
	Quote