DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Lunims** · 01-13-2012, 07:45 PM

I'm still on the fence with regards to Serena and what she will do here, but I think Kanepi is more appropriately associated with the lose to a nobody. It's a slam and although injured I don't think Serena will go down that easily, unless it's one of the TOP players.

I think Bepa will do okay as well in the early rounds, lots of players can't live up to the hype when it come to the slams, I think they do better when their names are not called to much prior, then you have the upsets. Pressure is a terrible thing.

Foxy

Serena certainly won't go down easily. I only consider her a question mark because I was watching the match when she jammed her knee and twisted her ankle. I think she's the kind of player who could limp through a win or two before being forced to withdraw. Also, I think Zahlovova Strycova and Cibulkova are terrible opponents to have when your movement isn't up to par.

01-13-2012, 07:45 PM	#6
Lunims Join Date Nov 2005 Location CA Posts 601 Senior Member	I'm still on the fence with regards to Serena and what she will do here, but I think Kanepi is more appropriately associated with the lose to a nobody. It's a slam and although injured I don't think Serena will go down that easily, unless it's one of the TOP players. I think Bepa will do okay as well in the early rounds, lots of players can't live up to the hype when it come to the slams, I think they do better when their names are not called to much prior, then you have the upsets. Pressure is a terrible thing. Foxy Serena certainly won't go down easily. I only consider her a question mark because I was watching the match when she jammed her knee and twisted her ankle. I think she's the kind of player who could limp through a win or two before being forced to withdraw. Also, I think Zahlovova Strycova and Cibulkova are terrible opponents to have when your movement isn't up to par.
	Quote