View Single Post
Old 08-16-2011, 05:22 AM   #6
rasiasertew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
561
Senior Member
Default
It seems to me they need a larger sampling than ten US Opens, even if it is a little unusual it happened for both the men's and women's draws.
Yes.

The world of random numbers is weird and sometimes looks not so random.
Just like flipping a coin 100 times will give a random streak of heads or tails and it will look not very random at all.
In this experiment, try to replace only 4 of the higher numbers (lets say remove rank 127 player and replace with say 55 and do it for number 1 seed for 4 years), in that case you will see that US Open results will be very similar to that of other tournaments. It really doesn't take much for couple fluke draws to make such a big effect.

Another thing to point at.. in an interview with Andrew Swift where he makes a comparison that the chance of draw happening that way was 1 in about 300,000. Same as flipping heads 18 times in a row on first flip... ok
but flipping same coin with these results

HTHTHTHTHTHTHTHTHT or
HHTTHHTTHHTTHHTTHH or

any other single possible combination will ALSO give you 1 in about 262,144 chance ((1/2)^18)
So, his analogy is really bad, imo
rasiasertew is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:53 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity