View Single Post
Old 08-16-2011, 05:13 PM   #21
myspauyijbv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
As I see it, these are basically what are called p-values: probabilities that the result could be achieved in true randomness. With a 100% p-value, there is a 100% chance that the draw would be perfectly random. Usually in statistics, a p-value of something less than 5% is needed for the result to be significant. Since this study had one of .3% for the men and 0% for the women, it'd be significant. Hope that makes sense.
If you're right, then their wording is horrible: "How frequently ESPN's simulated draws came up with average difficulty scores that were at least as low as scores for the actual Grand Slam draws. Percentages closer to 0 indicate a lower likelihood that the actual results are strictly due to random chance."

I would expect about half to be "at least as low" and half to be higher. No?
myspauyijbv is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:02 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity