DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**KatoabamyHant** · 05-24-2010, 04:01 PM

Well, exhibitionism has always been a prominent hobby of both sisters (well documented in these pages if you are not lazy to search)...

Exhibitionism? I can think of some examples for Serena, I suppose, but the only thing I can remember that Venus has done that would come close to qualifying for that is the picture book (see avatar), yet most people would qualify that as the artistic expression of a renowned photographer using Venus as a subject. If Fernando Verdasco can do underwear ads and Novak can parade around on a runway in underwear as part of a fashion show, and neither of them are ashamed of their bodies (and I have no problem with either of them doing that, there's nothing wrong with it at all), then I don't know why Venus or any other woman should be ashamed of her body.

I don't like the undergarments, either. I wish they were black or the reddish/purple color in the dress and not flesh-toned. But if I had a dime for every time a photograph showed Mattek's deep cleavage (USO leopard/gold outfit) or the shapely butt of a female player or a huge bulge in a guy's shorts or Radek's see-through shorts at last year's USO, I'd be rich.

The problem is the color, not the fact that one can see the outline of Venus' butt. If seeing the shape of a woman's butt is shameful to the WTA, it's going to be a long and damaging French Open--and every other tournament as well.

Perhaps we should force the women to wear traditional culottes?

http://www.dressingforhisglory.com/s...&products_id=5

05-24-2010, 04:01 PM	#26
KatoabamyHant Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 554 Senior Member	Well, exhibitionism has always been a prominent hobby of both sisters (well documented in these pages if you are not lazy to search)... Exhibitionism? I can think of some examples for Serena, I suppose, but the only thing I can remember that Venus has done that would come close to qualifying for that is the picture book (see avatar), yet most people would qualify that as the artistic expression of a renowned photographer using Venus as a subject. If Fernando Verdasco can do underwear ads and Novak can parade around on a runway in underwear as part of a fashion show, and neither of them are ashamed of their bodies (and I have no problem with either of them doing that, there's nothing wrong with it at all), then I don't know why Venus or any other woman should be ashamed of her body. I don't like the undergarments, either. I wish they were black or the reddish/purple color in the dress and not flesh-toned. But if I had a dime for every time a photograph showed Mattek's deep cleavage (USO leopard/gold outfit) or the shapely butt of a female player or a huge bulge in a guy's shorts or Radek's see-through shorts at last year's USO, I'd be rich. The problem is the color, not the fact that one can see the outline of Venus' butt. If seeing the shape of a woman's butt is shameful to the WTA, it's going to be a long and damaging French Open--and every other tournament as well. Perhaps we should force the women to wear traditional culottes? http://www.dressingforhisglory.com/s...&products_id=5
	Quote