DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**enurneAcourdy** · 06-01-2010, 04:14 PM

Tennis Channel is also on a premium sports tier on Time Warner. I pay an additional $5 (plus tax) for it, a few extra Fox Sports Nets (that are worthless, by the way - do I really want to see college hockey between two schools in Missouri?), Speed and Fuel. I think all those, except tennis channel, are fox stations we were going to lose if that agreement had not been reached. Why is tennis channel lumped in with them?

I would also get AT&T U-Verse in a minute if they had the tennis channel.

06-01-2010, 04:14 PM	#9
enurneAcourdy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 727 Senior Member	Tennis Channel is also on a premium sports tier on Time Warner. I pay an additional $5 (plus tax) for it, a few extra Fox Sports Nets (that are worthless, by the way - do I really want to see college hockey between two schools in Missouri?), Speed and Fuel. I think all those, except tennis channel, are fox stations we were going to lose if that agreement had not been reached. Why is tennis channel lumped in with them? I would also get AT&T U-Verse in a minute if they had the tennis channel.
	Quote