DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**bobibnoxx** · 01-12-2009, 07:10 PM

Seems like a pretty fair list to me. I doubt there will be much debate about the choices for 1 and 2. Djokovic making the top 10 seemed odd to me at first, but perhaps #9 is about right.

Yeah, I was thinking maybe Ivanisevic should be in there for the Wimbledon run, but he didn't do anything else this decade, while Djokovic and Ferrero had both been at the top continuously.

Can't really justify putting a non-slam winner like Nalbandian in there with enough top-player slam winners to go around.

I can't even validly debate Roddick's placement, something that obviously gives me pain

Maybe give more respect to Hewitt. Timing or not, he had such a stronghold on No.1 in his time.

01-12-2009, 07:10 PM	#3
bobibnoxx Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 670 Senior Member	Seems like a pretty fair list to me. I doubt there will be much debate about the choices for 1 and 2. Djokovic making the top 10 seemed odd to me at first, but perhaps #9 is about right. Yeah, I was thinking maybe Ivanisevic should be in there for the Wimbledon run, but he didn't do anything else this decade, while Djokovic and Ferrero had both been at the top continuously. Can't really justify putting a non-slam winner like Nalbandian in there with enough top-player slam winners to go around. I can't even validly debate Roddick's placement, something that obviously gives me pain Maybe give more respect to Hewitt. Timing or not, he had such a stronghold on No.1 in his time.
	Quote