DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Peretool** · 10-29-2009, 09:35 PM

Weight Slams heavier...Require that to be #1, you own a Slam. I might also look at bringing back quality points, though you had the problem then that you do now, just it did not seem as bad in retrospect.

Does that slam have to be won in the past 52 weeks to be considered for #1, or could that slam have been achieved years earlier?

I ask because, you see, any system we come up with will also have faults.

10-29-2009, 09:35 PM	#27
Peretool Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 516 Senior Member	Weight Slams heavier...Require that to be #1, you own a Slam. I might also look at bringing back quality points, though you had the problem then that you do now, just it did not seem as bad in retrospect. Does that slam have to be won in the past 52 weeks to be considered for #1, or could that slam have been achieved years earlier? I ask because, you see, any system we come up with will also have faults.
	Quote