DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**gardenerextraordinaire** · 10-29-2009, 09:36 PM

Weight Slams heavier...Require that to be #1, you own a Slam. I might also look at bringing back quality points, though you had the problem then that you do now, just it did not seem as bad in retrospect.

I was always a BIG fan of the quality points. I cried the day they went away.

But when I look at the tour being what it is today, and the fact that there is basically no difference at all between the player ranked #5 and the player ranked #105, I'm not sure I can advocate it as much of a solution.

But I agree with weighting the majors even more. A major should be worth 3-4 times as much as the top of the Tier 1 value.

10-29-2009, 09:36 PM	#29
gardenerextraordinaire Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 709 Senior Member	Weight Slams heavier...Require that to be #1, you own a Slam. I might also look at bringing back quality points, though you had the problem then that you do now, just it did not seem as bad in retrospect. I was always a BIG fan of the quality points. I cried the day they went away. But when I look at the tour being what it is today, and the fact that there is basically no difference at all between the player ranked #5 and the player ranked #105, I'm not sure I can advocate it as much of a solution. But I agree with weighting the majors even more. A major should be worth 3-4 times as much as the top of the Tier 1 value.
	Quote