DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**MondayBlues** · 07-24-2009, 06:03 PM

What if they decide that...

1. A blood doping offense DID occur (no dispute there) and...

2. Paszek didn't know that she was committing a doping offense...

Are they obligated to punish the offense just because it occurred? From what I read, it sounds like they go way out of their way to punish offenses just because they "happened" intentional or not

Paszek did the responsible thing and came forward. I think it would be good to...just acknowledge this happened and leave it at that with a warning that Paszek needs to pay VERY close attention to what the doctors are doing to her at all times.

07-24-2009, 06:03 PM	#17
MondayBlues Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 429 Senior Member	What if they decide that... 1. A blood doping offense DID occur (no dispute there) and... 2. Paszek didn't know that she was committing a doping offense... Are they obligated to punish the offense just because it occurred? From what I read, it sounds like they go way out of their way to punish offenses just because they "happened" intentional or not Paszek did the responsible thing and came forward. I think it would be good to...just acknowledge this happened and leave it at that with a warning that Paszek needs to pay VERY close attention to what the doctors are doing to her at all times.
	Quote