View Single Post
Old 06-29-2009, 08:31 PM   #11
Assunkkensatt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
637
Senior Member
Default
I'm confused by this part of the article:

The fact that many seats remained empty for the Cirstea-Azarenka clash implies that the knowledgeable SW19 crowd were underwhelmed by the tennis on offer.

Are they saying Cirstea is not attractive? I know many people feel Vika is not a babe, but I certainly find her attractive.

Vika is ok. I think her nose overwhelms her face but other than that she's ok.

It's an insult to female athletes IMO. And while a casual fan may stop and look at a pretty face if the tennis sucks then they won't look again. The article mentions the empty seats during one of the "pretty girl" matches so what is the reasoning behind this? It can't be to grow the sport.

Agree 100%


Foxy
Assunkkensatt is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:13 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity