DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - The Times's definitive list of the top Wimbledon players

**berdyanskdotsu** · 12-06-2009, 02:02 PM

Thanks Omess. That's interesting although I find it difficult to include people that played almost a century ago.

And I strongly disagree with Roger being in front of Borg who had to beat the likes of Nastase, Connors and McEnroe (Roger had to beat a young Nadal, Roddick and Philippoussis). Also because the back to back FO/Wimby.

12-06-2009, 02:02 PM	#2
berdyanskdotsu Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 428 Senior Member	Thanks Omess. That's interesting although I find it difficult to include people that played almost a century ago. And I strongly disagree with Roger being in front of Borg who had to beat the likes of Nastase, Connors and McEnroe (Roger had to beat a young Nadal, Roddick and Philippoussis). Also because the back to back FO/Wimby.
	Quote