DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**abossakon** · 05-06-2009, 08:50 PM

I'm going with Sveta in 3. I believe if she wins her second slam she can get her career back on track. But I wouldn't be disappointed with Dina winning either, I just think it would be nicer seeing Sveta get out from the 1 slammer title.

Me too. She's too solid a player to just have one (and don't get me started on Elena). But I'd be curious to do a little research project on who are the best one-slammers in history. Tennis magazine did something like this a few years ago for slamless wonders and came up with something like Todd Martin and Helena Sukova. I forget their criteria (I do remember that to be considered, they had to have reached at least one slam final) but I agreed with it for the most part.

05-06-2009, 08:50 PM	#14
abossakon Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 540 Senior Member	I'm going with Sveta in 3. I believe if she wins her second slam she can get her career back on track. But I wouldn't be disappointed with Dina winning either, I just think it would be nicer seeing Sveta get out from the 1 slammer title. Me too. She's too solid a player to just have one (and don't get me started on Elena). But I'd be curious to do a little research project on who are the best one-slammers in history. Tennis magazine did something like this a few years ago for slamless wonders and came up with something like Todd Martin and Helena Sukova. I forget their criteria (I do remember that to be considered, they had to have reached at least one slam final) but I agreed with it for the most part.
	Quote