DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**MaickiP** · 11-15-2008, 11:34 PM

WTA
95" Martina Hingis 87 to 16
96' Anna Kournikova 281 to 57
97' Venus Williams 204 to 22
98' Serena Williams 99 to 20
99' Kim Clijsters 409 to 47
00' Daja Bedanova 292 to 54
01' Daniela Hantuchova 108 to 38
02' Svetlana Kuznetsova 259 to 43
03' Maria Sharapova 186 to 32
04' Tatiana Golovin 345 to 27
05' Sania Mirza 206 to 31
06' Agnieszka Radwanska 381 to 57
07' Agnes Szavay 207 to 20

A lot of these players became great singles champs, but what strikes me is that even more of them had great doubles success. Kournikova, Hantuchova and Golovin have won doubles slams but not singles, and Clijsters won more doubles slams then singles. Venus and Serena have won every important doubles title there is.

I have no idea who Bedanova is.

11-15-2008, 11:34 PM	#8
MaickiP Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 641 Senior Member	WTA 95" Martina Hingis 87 to 16 96' Anna Kournikova 281 to 57 97' Venus Williams 204 to 22 98' Serena Williams 99 to 20 99' Kim Clijsters 409 to 47 00' Daja Bedanova 292 to 54 01' Daniela Hantuchova 108 to 38 02' Svetlana Kuznetsova 259 to 43 03' Maria Sharapova 186 to 32 04' Tatiana Golovin 345 to 27 05' Sania Mirza 206 to 31 06' Agnieszka Radwanska 381 to 57 07' Agnes Szavay 207 to 20 A lot of these players became great singles champs, but what strikes me is that even more of them had great doubles success. Kournikova, Hantuchova and Golovin have won doubles slams but not singles, and Clijsters won more doubles slams then singles. Venus and Serena have won every important doubles title there is. I have no idea who Bedanova is.
	Quote