DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**trowUrillioth** · 03-08-2007, 01:01 PM

You're correct. It was Sargisian who ended up being the suspect in 2005.

I have to apologize. Since I don't bet sports - any sports, I don't always follow what is going on. I'm not ignoring the charts it's just that my attention wanders on these things.

No, that's not actually what I meant, I was just wondering why they cited Sargsian's "history" - I don't remember any other issues.

It also couldn't really be that Sargsian was the (only) suspect. He was not the one retiring up a set.

03-08-2007, 01:01 PM	#6
trowUrillioth Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 671 Senior Member	You're correct. It was Sargisian who ended up being the suspect in 2005. I have to apologize. Since I don't bet sports - any sports, I don't always follow what is going on. I'm not ignoring the charts it's just that my attention wanders on these things. No, that's not actually what I meant, I was just wondering why they cited Sargsian's "history" - I don't remember any other issues. It also couldn't really be that Sargsian was the (only) suspect. He was not the one retiring up a set.
	Quote