DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**trowUrillioth** · 03-08-2007, 01:17 PM

No, that's not actually what I meant, I was just wondering why they cited Sargsian's "history" - I don't remember any other issues.

It also couldn't really be that Sargsian was the (only) suspect. He was not the one retiring up a set.

They were cleared in 2005, btw.

Irakli Labadze was fined earlier in 2005 for allegedly throwing a match on which his friend had a bet, though.

03-08-2007, 01:17 PM	#8
trowUrillioth Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 671 Senior Member	No, that's not actually what I meant, I was just wondering why they cited Sargsian's "history" - I don't remember any other issues. It also couldn't really be that Sargsian was the (only) suspect. He was not the one retiring up a set. They were cleared in 2005, btw. Irakli Labadze was fined earlier in 2005 for allegedly throwing a match on which his friend had a bet, though.
	Quote