DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**gluckmeea** · 04-08-2008, 05:53 PM

The detail I am waiting to here about again is whether they stuck to the maximum number of top players that can play at the non-mandatory events (except those positioned the week before a major). Because it's just a real shame if tournaments like Charleston can only have one top 6 or two top 14 players. I fear financially, they will go under within a few years.

I sound like a broken record, but that part is the problem I had with the whole system. I have no trouble with mandatory events.

04-08-2008, 05:53 PM	#3
gluckmeea Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 498 Senior Member	The detail I am waiting to here about again is whether they stuck to the maximum number of top players that can play at the non-mandatory events (except those positioned the week before a major). Because it's just a real shame if tournaments like Charleston can only have one top 6 or two top 14 players. I fear financially, they will go under within a few years. I sound like a broken record, but that part is the problem I had with the whole system. I have no trouble with mandatory events.
	Quote