View Single Post
Old 04-08-2008, 05:58 PM   #5
QxmFwtlam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
527
Senior Member
Default
The detail I am waiting to here about again is whether they stuck to the maximum number of top players that can play at the non-mandatory events (except those positioned the week before a major). Because it's just a real shame if tournaments like Charleston can only have one top 6 or two top 14 players. I fear financially, they will go under within a few years.

I sound like a broken record, but that part is the problem I had with the whole system. I have no trouble with mandatory events.
No problem with the fact that all of the mandatory events are hardcourt/indoor events? If they did that in the ATP, half of the guys in the top 100 (maybe more) would defect the ATP and create their own tour.
QxmFwtlam is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:09 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity