View Single Post
Old 03-27-2012, 11:22 PM   #85
Coededgeme

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
334
Senior Member
Default
Way to generalize. Youre talking about if a team sucks the NFL would step in like a communistic government and take it over and force the OWNER, who bought it with their assets and force them to sell it regardless if its at a loss or a gain to them.

And its not limiting pay as much as its leveling the playing field which is what the SC does. A point you dont seem to grasp.
The point you don't grasp is that the league is one business. The NFL is a business, that has 32 franchises. These franchises compete against each other to be the best, because the selling of the game is what generates a profit for the business. If one of these franchises refuses to improve itself it's hurting the business therefore they needed to be correct.


as far as a salary cap, I find it utterly baffling how someone can support a salary cap while pretending something else is socialistic. You can't have it both ways, We are both throwing out socialistic ideas here. A salary cap, any way you cut it, for whatever reason is socialistic, it's anti-American.

Leveling the playing field is what all socialists use to describe their goals.
Coededgeme is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:57 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity