DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**tobia** · 02-01-2012, 07:39 PM

If you want to make it about supporting cast:

Who had the better WRs?

Who had the better TEs?

Who had the better receiving threat out of the backfield?

Who had the better offensive line?

I could only give the edge to the Packers in one of those departments.

Packers have the WR's, but it's pretty close.
Packer's have more depth at TE, but weapon wise, Saints take it.
Yeah...Sproles, no contest.
At 100% health, this may be a wash. But the Packers haven't been at 100% here for awhile, and may not be for the rest of this season.

02-01-2012, 07:39 PM	#14
tobia Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 524 Senior Member	If you want to make it about supporting cast: Who had the better WRs? Who had the better TEs? Who had the better receiving threat out of the backfield? Who had the better offensive line? I could only give the edge to the Packers in one of those departments. Packers have the WR's, but it's pretty close. Packer's have more depth at TE, but weapon wise, Saints take it. Yeah...Sproles, no contest. At 100% health, this may be a wash. But the Packers haven't been at 100% here for awhile, and may not be for the rest of this season.
	Quote