DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**littlePen** · 12-23-2010, 10:28 PM

probably. but he was the workhorse on some pretty good teams.

Dillon's numbers are only a few thousand yards off of Martin's numbers. I tend to think of Martin as a definite HOFer so I think Dillon at least warrants some consideration.

But I agree -- Dillon falls short, especially when you consider guys like Fred Taylor have already surpassed Dillon and active RBs (Portis, Thomas Jones) will probably surpass Dillon. I don't think Portis or Jones belong at this point.

12-23-2010, 10:28 PM	#9
littlePen Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 529 Senior Member	probably. but he was the workhorse on some pretty good teams. Dillon's numbers are only a few thousand yards off of Martin's numbers. I tend to think of Martin as a definite HOFer so I think Dillon at least warrants some consideration. But I agree -- Dillon falls short, especially when you consider guys like Fred Taylor have already surpassed Dillon and active RBs (Portis, Thomas Jones) will probably surpass Dillon. I don't think Portis or Jones belong at this point.
	Quote