DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**indianstory** · 01-03-2010, 07:15 AM

Do you agree with the pick or do you think Feags should've got the nod? I rly dont think i'm bein' biased here ...

There's absolutely no way Lechler was not going to be on the team. As for the second punter on the list, I'm not sure anyone really cares all that much. Moorman has a better average than Feagles, but more importantly, he has a 117.9 career passer rating. The guy is sick.

If Feagles were on it, I wouldn't feel like Moorman got snubbed. They're punters, though. Does it really matter in the long run? Also -- I'm surprised Akers made it.

01-03-2010, 07:15 AM	#12
indianstory Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 532 Senior Member	Do you agree with the pick or do you think Feags should've got the nod? I rly dont think i'm bein' biased here ... There's absolutely no way Lechler was not going to be on the team. As for the second punter on the list, I'm not sure anyone really cares all that much. Moorman has a better average than Feagles, but more importantly, he has a 117.9 career passer rating. The guy is sick. If Feagles were on it, I wouldn't feel like Moorman got snubbed. They're punters, though. Does it really matter in the long run? Also -- I'm surprised Akers made it.
	Quote