DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**seperalem** · 11-09-2009, 08:28 PM

I agree. I'm happy as is, I believe team wins toss only wins at slightly better then 50%....so...

I'm not worried about the winning %age. I don't think you'll see a huge swing in coin-toss winners suddenly dropping to only winning 20% of the games.

What I want is actual football product deciding the games. If we want kickers to decide the game, can't we go watch soccer? If we want 'special teams' to decide it, we can do that.

I'd like real football to decide the game. Take the ball. Move down the field. Score a TD. If you are unable to do so, then your opponent gets a chance to do so. If you choose to take the FG (hey.. this sounds like a real football game, where a FG is the backup option, not the best option)... then your opponent gets the chance to shove it in your face and win the game.

11-09-2009, 08:28 PM	#48
seperalem Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 360 Senior Member	I agree. I'm happy as is, I believe team wins toss only wins at slightly better then 50%....so... I'm not worried about the winning %age. I don't think you'll see a huge swing in coin-toss winners suddenly dropping to only winning 20% of the games. What I want is actual football product deciding the games. If we want kickers to decide the game, can't we go watch soccer? If we want 'special teams' to decide it, we can do that. I'd like real football to decide the game. Take the ball. Move down the field. Score a TD. If you are unable to do so, then your opponent gets a chance to do so. If you choose to take the FG (hey.. this sounds like a real football game, where a FG is the backup option, not the best option)... then your opponent gets the chance to shove it in your face and win the game.
	Quote