DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Si8jy8HN** · 06-26-2008, 08:32 PM

my argument is bad? the guy said my team would suck if i chose welker over hester. i was just curious who sucked out of the bears and pats last year.

i'll tell what a bad argument is: saying a guy who max is on the field for 6-7 plays a game is a better player than a guy who caught 112 passes last year for 1,175 yards and 8 tds. that's an awful argument.

You can't just say "which team is better" to substantiate that argument though. The point you just presented right here, that's much more intelligent/convincing/accurate. It's not as though Welker or Hester was the main cog in their team's success or failure.

06-26-2008, 08:32 PM	#43
Si8jy8HN Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 485 Senior Member	my argument is bad? the guy said my team would suck if i chose welker over hester. i was just curious who sucked out of the bears and pats last year. i'll tell what a bad argument is: saying a guy who max is on the field for 6-7 plays a game is a better player than a guy who caught 112 passes last year for 1,175 yards and 8 tds. that's an awful argument. You can't just say "which team is better" to substantiate that argument though. The point you just presented right here, that's much more intelligent/convincing/accurate. It's not as though Welker or Hester was the main cog in their team's success or failure.
	Quote