View Single Post
Old 04-23-2008, 03:01 AM   #4
MarlboroCig

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
I dont think that would work for 1 reason, teams dont want to sign a player for 2 or 3 years only to see that player after the 2 or 3 years just sign for more money some place else, atleast with these big contracts they get the guys for 5-7 years
i'm willing to bet owners would be ok with it. They'd still be restricted so they could match any offer and or franchise tag...

players union wont agree to long term small dollar deals....
MarlboroCig is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:06 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity