DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**zzarratusstra** · 02-01-2006, 10:15 PM

Really...this is astonishing to me. I provided you people with a godforsaken link from the NCAA stating that their was a split national championship and you're still denying its existence.

If you won't acknowledge a link from the NCAA, what would you like?

That link doesn't say there were two champions. It says two teams held trophies. I dont know if the AP actually gives you a trophy for being #1 in their rankings, but even if so it doesnt give you the championship. It does NOT say there were two champions. All the site is implying is that there was still controversy.

The CHAMPIONSHIP game determines the champions. Your argument would be like saying that the Colts are a split champion this season even if they dont win the Superbowl but the press votes them still #1.

02-01-2006, 10:15 PM	#45
zzarratusstra Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 459 Senior Member	Really...this is astonishing to me. I provided you people with a godforsaken link from the NCAA stating that their was a split national championship and you're still denying its existence. If you won't acknowledge a link from the NCAA, what would you like? That link doesn't say there were two champions. It says two teams held trophies. I dont know if the AP actually gives you a trophy for being #1 in their rankings, but even if so it doesnt give you the championship. It does NOT say there were two champions. All the site is implying is that there was still controversy. The CHAMPIONSHIP game determines the champions. Your argument would be like saying that the Colts are a split champion this season even if they dont win the Superbowl but the press votes them still #1.
	Quote