DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**L6RLnyfl** · 02-01-2006, 11:37 PM

From what I've gathered, the NCAA wanted the BCS to be what I thought it is--a game that determines an undisputed champion. However, with a lack of public support and the AP pulling out, they can't really do that. They, on an annual basis, just hope they don't get embarrased too much (like in 2003).

And this is the system that we will have for at least 4 more years, though it accidentally worked this year.

02-01-2006, 11:37 PM	#68
L6RLnyfl Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 405 Senior Member	From what I've gathered, the NCAA wanted the BCS to be what I thought it is--a game that determines an undisputed champion. However, with a lack of public support and the AP pulling out, they can't really do that. They, on an annual basis, just hope they don't get embarrased too much (like in 2003). And this is the system that we will have for at least 4 more years, though it accidentally worked this year.
	Quote