DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**fhutiussk** · 10-05-2006, 08:00 AM

Yeah, I don't think many people disagree with you there. I think the Browns are right to stand firm and not cave in to Winslow's salary cap terrorists... I mean, er, uh... Agents.

It was believed that the Redskins really wanted Winslow in the draft but decided to select Sean Taylor instead simply because they didn't want to deal with Carl Poston. To me, that is definitely a sign to get rid of your agent when he is the cost of your draft position.
Plus, Winslow would have been so much better utilized in Joe Gibbs' system than Butch Davis'.

10-05-2006, 08:00 AM	#5
fhutiussk Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 382 Senior Member	Yeah, I don't think many people disagree with you there. I think the Browns are right to stand firm and not cave in to Winslow's salary cap terrorists... I mean, er, uh... Agents. It was believed that the Redskins really wanted Winslow in the draft but decided to select Sean Taylor instead simply because they didn't want to deal with Carl Poston. To me, that is definitely a sign to get rid of your agent when he is the cost of your draft position. Plus, Winslow would have been so much better utilized in Joe Gibbs' system than Butch Davis'.
	Quote