DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**diplmixxxx** · 05-20-2009, 04:06 AM

I'd put him at SF. I don't see him making it as a 4.

And no rich is definitely not the adjective I would use to describe the Grizz or Thunder

I don't see him as a SF at all. I think he's a 4, maybe a 5 for stretches in a small-ball lineup.

I think the Thunder will be rich in a couple years.

05-20-2009, 04:06 AM	#14
diplmixxxx Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 446 Senior Member	I'd put him at SF. I don't see him making it as a 4. And no rich is definitely not the adjective I would use to describe the Grizz or Thunder I don't see him as a SF at all. I think he's a 4, maybe a 5 for stretches in a small-ball lineup. I think the Thunder will be rich in a couple years.
	Quote