DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Fired U.S. attorneys testify before Congress

**ReginaPerss** · 07-04-2007, 02:11 AM

I really don't care one way or the other. But the case you're referring to is 14 years old. The one Sam is referring to is a year old.

While the passage of time doesn't make something "less wrong", the instance itself has no real bearing on the case currently under discussion.

I don't really go for the "well, they did it, so now we can" argument which, and I apologize if I'm wrong, you seem to be making.

Clearly, in '93, there were some serious problems. The seriousness of them, though, does not negate the seriousness of the one Sam is talking about, if the allegations are true.

That's all I'm sayin'...

If this is a reason for not voting for Republicans, it's equally a reason for not voting for Democrats is what I believe Acorn could be saying.

So, we're both slime, and you shouldn't vote for either of us...

07-04-2007, 02:11 AM	#14
ReginaPerss Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 489 Senior Member	I really don't care one way or the other. But the case you're referring to is 14 years old. The one Sam is referring to is a year old. While the passage of time doesn't make something "less wrong", the instance itself has no real bearing on the case currently under discussion. I don't really go for the "well, they did it, so now we can" argument which, and I apologize if I'm wrong, you seem to be making. Clearly, in '93, there were some serious problems. The seriousness of them, though, does not negate the seriousness of the one Sam is talking about, if the allegations are true. That's all I'm sayin'... If this is a reason for not voting for Republicans, it's equally a reason for not voting for Democrats is what I believe Acorn could be saying. So, we're both slime, and you shouldn't vote for either of us...
	Quote