View Single Post
Old 06-03-2007, 09:18 PM   #19
Gasfghj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
doniston
Well now of course, you just had to spin this to a different meaning than was indicted by the OP. He said simply "multiple wives". he did NOT say multiple wifes at the same time. Oh, common now doni-boy...surely a good liberal like you who can detect an "implied" general right to privacy in the Consituition can detect the implied meaning meaning of "Multiple" given that it is immediately followed by a re-emphasis of "Marraige = One Man + One Woman". . Otherwise it is kinda a pointless post in that there is NOTHING incongruous with having HAD more than one prior spouse and accepting the defintion of A marriage as being between ONE man and ONE woman.

Now, had he added "till death do us part", it might not be as reasonable reading of what was written.
Gasfghj is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:09 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity