DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Drudge links to "Rudy a Dodger?" article.

**YpbWF5Yo** · 02-03-2007, 07:39 PM

You are talking about the same party that booed republicans when Bill Clinton's marriage was called into question and said that all the personal busniess should be left alone, right? You know, all that talk of being a bad husband doesn't mean anything about being a bad president?

I'm not a democrat, but let's not forget all the lashes Clinton took for his actions, real or perceived. The right dug up everything they could find, made-up what they couldn't find, and assasinated Clinton's character every chance they got.

Guiliani's character and marriage should be questioned where hypocrisy is evident. Clinton didn't preach "family values" nor did he lead anyone to believe that he was a sexual prude. Guiliani can't be pro-gay and have lived with gays one day, then be anti-gay all of a sudden the next day without people justifably questioning his motives. He can't pitch family values to the right and have the sleaze background that he has. He can't spout a lot of pro-war espit de' corp sacrifice American lives for your country rhetoric when he dodged the military himself.

Clinton's faux pax came after he was in office, but Guiliani comes into the race a flawed candidate. By the time democrats AND republicans get through tearing into his ass it will be interesting to see how much of him is left.

I agree with much of what you've said .. but this is called "what's good for the goose ... ". Perhaps political spin machines will one day reconsider making personal attacks part of the campaign. But after listening to 7 years of boisterous republican spin machine talk radio inspired rancor, the blowback is going to get ugly.

Rudy is in for a bumpy ride thanks to the hate-Clinton crowd.

02-03-2007, 07:39 PM	#32
YpbWF5Yo Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 469 Senior Member	You are talking about the same party that booed republicans when Bill Clinton's marriage was called into question and said that all the personal busniess should be left alone, right? You know, all that talk of being a bad husband doesn't mean anything about being a bad president? I'm not a democrat, but let's not forget all the lashes Clinton took for his actions, real or perceived. The right dug up everything they could find, made-up what they couldn't find, and assasinated Clinton's character every chance they got. Guiliani's character and marriage should be questioned where hypocrisy is evident. Clinton didn't preach "family values" nor did he lead anyone to believe that he was a sexual prude. Guiliani can't be pro-gay and have lived with gays one day, then be anti-gay all of a sudden the next day without people justifably questioning his motives. He can't pitch family values to the right and have the sleaze background that he has. He can't spout a lot of pro-war espit de' corp sacrifice American lives for your country rhetoric when he dodged the military himself. Clinton's faux pax came after he was in office, but Guiliani comes into the race a flawed candidate. By the time democrats AND republicans get through tearing into his ass it will be interesting to see how much of him is left. I agree with much of what you've said .. but this is called "what's good for the goose ... ". Perhaps political spin machines will one day reconsider making personal attacks part of the campaign. But after listening to 7 years of boisterous republican spin machine talk radio inspired rancor, the blowback is going to get ugly. Rudy is in for a bumpy ride thanks to the hate-Clinton crowd.
	Quote