View Single Post
Old 02-26-2007, 02:21 AM   #16
jinnamys

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
So in short you have chosen to believe a tiny handful of industry funded studies over the huge preponderance of evidence supported by the Acadamies of Science of every major nation on the planet. And you have chosen to do so because some of the scientists may have come from countries which you classify as socialist.

It follows logically that you must believe there is a massive socialist conspiracy at work here. Can you tell me what these socialists hope to accomplish by this hoax? And how have they subverted all the top scientists in the world?

And I'm still waiting to hear where you found that free market you were talking about.
You are mixing apples to oranges. There have been studies that suggest CO2 is in part to blame on the increase in surface temperature; however, there is only one study that suggested trading CO2 emssions will help lower CO2 emissions.

Take location A: It is a heavily industrialized location with a specific level of CO2 emissions.

Take Locaton B: it is a rural area with little CO2 emissions.

Now, if each location has a set standard rate for CO2 emissions, which location is more vulurnable, given everything else being equal. If you said Location A, then you go to the next step.

Now, Location A transfers (buys) CO2 emission levels from Location B while locaton B is still rural. So, have the CO2 emissions lowered or increased, Melted? If you said increase, then you go ahead of the class. If not, you go directly to jail and do not collect $200.

NOTE: This has nothing to do about socialism or any political system. It is about $$$$$$$$ in which one region is wanting to ceeate a money scheme, and that is all.
jinnamys is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:49 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity