DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Gymnfacymoota** · 02-19-2007, 03:37 AM

Man... Kerry certainly is a lying motherfucker. And dumb motherfuckers in the pinko press suck grape kool-aid riight out of his cock

Here is the facts that are contrary to what Kerry said yesterday in Congress.

1) Bush appointed Bob Gates, a member of the Iraq Study Group, to be Secretary of Defense.

2) The Iraq Study Group report advocated the "surge".

http://www.usip.org/isg/iraq_study_g...oup_report.pdf

3) Petraeus is the U.S. commander in Iraq

4) Petraeus Supports Troop Increase in Confirmation Hearing

Kerry is clearly a liar.

Here is the entire paragraph:

Because of the importance of Iraq to our regional security goals and to our ongoing fight against al Qaeda, we considered proposals to make a substantial increase (100,000 to 200,000) in the number of U.S. troops in Iraq. We rejected this course because we do not believe that the needed levels are available for a sustained deployment. Further, adding more American troops could conceivably worsen those aspects of the security problem that are fed by the view that the U.S. presence is intended to be a long-term “occupation.” We could, however, support a shortterm redeployment or surge of American combat forces to stabilize Baghdad, or to speed up the training and equipping mission, if the U.S. commander in Iraq determines that such steps would be effective. Note the word "could" in the lower part, not that they "do" support. And again, they don't focus on surge, they said it could be a redeployment. To say that they advocate that one specific action is a stretch.

02-19-2007, 03:37 AM	#31
Gymnfacymoota Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 470 Senior Member	Man... Kerry certainly is a lying motherfucker. And dumb motherfuckers in the pinko press suck grape kool-aid riight out of his cock Here is the facts that are contrary to what Kerry said yesterday in Congress. 1) Bush appointed Bob Gates, a member of the Iraq Study Group, to be Secretary of Defense. 2) The Iraq Study Group report advocated the "surge". http://www.usip.org/isg/iraq_study_g...oup_report.pdf 3) Petraeus is the U.S. commander in Iraq 4) Petraeus Supports Troop Increase in Confirmation Hearing Kerry is clearly a liar. Here is the entire paragraph: Because of the importance of Iraq to our regional security goals and to our ongoing fight against al Qaeda, we considered proposals to make a substantial increase (100,000 to 200,000) in the number of U.S. troops in Iraq. We rejected this course because we do not believe that the needed levels are available for a sustained deployment. Further, adding more American troops could conceivably worsen those aspects of the security problem that are fed by the view that the U.S. presence is intended to be a long-term “occupation.” We could, however, support a shortterm redeployment or surge of American combat forces to stabilize Baghdad, or to speed up the training and equipping mission, if the U.S. commander in Iraq determines that such steps would be effective. Note the word "could" in the lower part, not that they "do" support. And again, they don't focus on surge, they said it could be a redeployment. To say that they advocate that one specific action is a stretch.
	Quote