DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Evoryboypoto** · 01-26-2007, 12:05 AM

Well, why would you consider these men illegal in the first place?

1. They disguised themselves as the US.
2. They have no official government.

but...

1. You consider "terrorists" to be a legitimate faction, thus, their official uniform is that of any variety.

2. But you consider this to be a war with POWs, right?

I thought I was clear before, but let me restate myself more forcefully. The claim that "any" is a uniform is either insane, a lie or a attempt at a legal loophole, but it is not true. The behaviour you sited may have been a military operation instead of their more normal terroristic tactics, but it still fell short of a legitimate military tactic, for reasons well stated by Thematic-Device.

01-26-2007, 12:05 AM	#23
Evoryboypoto Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 377 Senior Member	Well, why would you consider these men illegal in the first place? 1. They disguised themselves as the US. 2. They have no official government. but... 1. You consider "terrorists" to be a legitimate faction, thus, their official uniform is that of any variety. 2. But you consider this to be a war with POWs, right? I thought I was clear before, but let me restate myself more forcefully. The claim that "any" is a uniform is either insane, a lie or a attempt at a legal loophole, but it is not true. The behaviour you sited may have been a military operation instead of their more normal terroristic tactics, but it still fell short of a legitimate military tactic, for reasons well stated by Thematic-Device.
	Quote