DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**DoctorDeryOne** · 01-26-2007, 01:43 AM

BTW Are you comfortable with the idea that a military force facing an enemy with the uniform of "any" would open fire on any appoaching civilians who are wearing "any" clothing because they are wearing the "uniform" of the enemy?

This is why considering the WOT to be a real "war" is ridiculous: because it doesn't work.

Recall the OP:

This is interesting not because of what happened, but the way in which people will consider it. Was this an irregulars' act of terrorism? Or was it a legitimate military operation? Some people consider the "War on Terror" to be an actual war, no different from any other (since they consider those captured to not be allowed to stand trial until the "war" is over).

01-26-2007, 01:43 AM	#28
DoctorDeryOne Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 506 Senior Member	BTW Are you comfortable with the idea that a military force facing an enemy with the uniform of "any" would open fire on any appoaching civilians who are wearing "any" clothing because they are wearing the "uniform" of the enemy? This is why considering the WOT to be a real "war" is ridiculous: because it doesn't work. Recall the OP: This is interesting not because of what happened, but the way in which people will consider it. Was this an irregulars' act of terrorism? Or was it a legitimate military operation? Some people consider the "War on Terror" to be an actual war, no different from any other (since they consider those captured to not be allowed to stand trial until the "war" is over).
	Quote