DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Global warming

**cepAceryTem** · 02-02-2007, 06:18 PM

2006 was the hottest year on record for the U.S. Worldwide, it is the 6th highest year on record.

2006 Breaks U.S. Temperature Record, National Climatic Data Center Says Last Year Was Warmest In Our History - CBS News

Although I must say that concentrating on the last few years and pointing out that the graph has been misread is kind of silly and does nothing to debunk the trend that the graph demonstrates over time. (if you want to use it as a evidence for argument.)

Since we are talking about GLOBAL WARMING and not US warming your response is a bit silly. I was merely backing up another poster who was chastized because he referenced a group of scientists in 1998 that don't agree with the human activity hypothosis. The chastizer said a 1998 study was not relevant. Also a bit silly. If you read the subsequent posts you will see my point.

While EricOKC may have oversimplified it just a tad, his assertion is still true. Many scientists do not agree about the cause of global warming. Even those that do have predictions all over the map as to how high a tempurature, how long it will last, how high the seas will get (estimates from a foot or two to 20

). If this is so "put to bed" based on real scientific methods, how is we have such as disparity by the "experts"? Real scientific methods say that if I come to a conclusion, it should be able to be duplicated by anyone else if it is to be valid. I don't see that here but hey, I'm just thinking.

02-02-2007, 06:18 PM	#33
cepAceryTem Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 517 Senior Member	2006 was the hottest year on record for the U.S. Worldwide, it is the 6th highest year on record. 2006 Breaks U.S. Temperature Record, National Climatic Data Center Says Last Year Was Warmest In Our History - CBS News Although I must say that concentrating on the last few years and pointing out that the graph has been misread is kind of silly and does nothing to debunk the trend that the graph demonstrates over time. (if you want to use it as a evidence for argument.) Since we are talking about GLOBAL WARMING and not US warming your response is a bit silly. I was merely backing up another poster who was chastized because he referenced a group of scientists in 1998 that don't agree with the human activity hypothosis. The chastizer said a 1998 study was not relevant. Also a bit silly. If you read the subsequent posts you will see my point. While EricOKC may have oversimplified it just a tad, his assertion is still true. Many scientists do not agree about the cause of global warming. Even those that do have predictions all over the map as to how high a tempurature, how long it will last, how high the seas will get (estimates from a foot or two to 20). If this is so "put to bed" based on real scientific methods, how is we have such as disparity by the "experts"? Real scientific methods say that if I come to a conclusion, it should be able to be duplicated by anyone else if it is to be valid. I don't see that here but hey, I'm just thinking.
	Quote