DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**corolaelwis** · 01-20-2007, 10:10 PM

lose in 2004--got 48% of the vote, and most did that just because he was not Bush. That is how toxic the air has been.

Precisely, so think how many will vote for the GOP simply because its a vote against Hillary? And the fact that if we nominate a social conservative that will rally the entire GOP base, so we'll have all of the GOP vote and a lot of the Anti-Hillary vote which will be more than enough.

On the other hand if we nominate a Guiliani or even God Forbid McCain then we'll easily carry the independant and swing voters with a slight loss of the base.

Either way we win.

01-20-2007, 10:10 PM	#25
corolaelwis Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 470 Senior Member	lose in 2004--got 48% of the vote, and most did that just because he was not Bush. That is how toxic the air has been. Precisely, so think how many will vote for the GOP simply because its a vote against Hillary? And the fact that if we nominate a social conservative that will rally the entire GOP base, so we'll have all of the GOP vote and a lot of the Anti-Hillary vote which will be more than enough. On the other hand if we nominate a Guiliani or even God Forbid McCain then we'll easily carry the independant and swing voters with a slight loss of the base. Either way we win.
	Quote