DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**gkruCRi1** · 01-21-2007, 01:38 AM

That decision was about the ex post facto clause in section 10.

I was talking about section 9.

In other words, you cannot make a law that punishes someone for something that was done before that law was passed.

It's the same term so there is no difference as to what it encompasses.

01-21-2007, 01:38 AM	#12
gkruCRi1 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 505 Senior Member	That decision was about the ex post facto clause in section 10. I was talking about section 9. In other words, you cannot make a law that punishes someone for something that was done before that law was passed. It's the same term so there is no difference as to what it encompasses.
	Quote