DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**ClorrerVeks** · 01-17-2007, 06:08 PM

So then, your argument is not that social security should be ABOLISHED, but that people should have the CHOICE between paying social security tax (as part of their regular taxes to the government) or using that amount of money for whatever purpose they see fit. Am I right?

(If I'm wrong on the taxes part of it, please correct me - it's been a while since I worked in the US).

And why privatize all education? If thats done, won't it become too expensive for the general majority?

You are correct, I would prepose the abolition of mandatory participation in social security.

01-17-2007, 06:08 PM	#16
ClorrerVeks Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 446 Senior Member	So then, your argument is not that social security should be ABOLISHED, but that people should have the CHOICE between paying social security tax (as part of their regular taxes to the government) or using that amount of money for whatever purpose they see fit. Am I right? (If I'm wrong on the taxes part of it, please correct me - it's been a while since I worked in the US). And why privatize all education? If thats done, won't it become too expensive for the general majority? You are correct, I would prepose the abolition of mandatory participation in social security.
	Quote