DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**JonnLeejsp** · 01-17-2007, 05:49 PM

By Greg Moran
STAFF WRITER
January 13, 2007

-The ruling was not unexpected because of the events after the May 3 ruling in which Judge Gordon Thompson Jr. moved to enforce an order he initially made in 1991. He told the city to move the cross because it violated the state constitution's ban on government aid and preference for religion.

Source: Mount Soledad cross case appeal by city dismissed | The San Diego Union-Tribune

Commentary: After decades of atheist and A.C.L.U. efforts and millions of there dollars, case dismissed.
The anti-Christian who brought the suit is dead and the suit against San Diego doesn’t apply because they don’t own the land.
The guy should have bought a jet ski instead. He wasted his whole meaningless miserable life. (More so then other moonbats.)

As is your wont Hank you have completely misread this piece of news. It has been pointed out here many times before that this case has moved to federal court as a result of the city transferring ownership. And I'm not sure which appelant you're talking about but one of them is a Jewish veterans group wich is decidedly not dead.

I will once again point out to you that many many christians in this country support enforcement of the establishment clause. My priest is one.

01-17-2007, 05:49 PM	#17
JonnLeejsp Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 407 Senior Member	By Greg Moran STAFF WRITER January 13, 2007 -The ruling was not unexpected because of the events after the May 3 ruling in which Judge Gordon Thompson Jr. moved to enforce an order he initially made in 1991. He told the city to move the cross because it violated the state constitution's ban on government aid and preference for religion. Source: Mount Soledad cross case appeal by city dismissed \| The San Diego Union-Tribune Commentary: After decades of atheist and A.C.L.U. efforts and millions of there dollars, case dismissed. The anti-Christian who brought the suit is dead and the suit against San Diego doesn’t apply because they don’t own the land. The guy should have bought a jet ski instead. He wasted his whole meaningless miserable life. (More so then other moonbats.) As is your wont Hank you have completely misread this piece of news. It has been pointed out here many times before that this case has moved to federal court as a result of the city transferring ownership. And I'm not sure which appelant you're talking about but one of them is a Jewish veterans group wich is decidedly not dead. I will once again point out to you that many many christians in this country support enforcement of the establishment clause. My priest is one.
	Quote