View Single Post
Old 05-01-2007, 12:39 PM   #7
Angeheade

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
679
Senior Member
Default
It’s been done before by democrats. This is for emergency conditions only and does not include private citizens not involved in terrorism.
Is that like, Clinton did it first?

Bush Warned About Mail-Opening Authority - Recent 'Signing Statement' Seen as Stretching Law, Washington Post, Jan. 5, 2006:

Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies in Washington, said the government has long been able to legally open mail believed to contain a bomb or other imminent threat. But authorities are generally required to seek a warrant from a criminal or special intelligence court in other cases, Martin and other experts said.

"The administration is playing games about warrants," Martin said. "If they are not claiming new powers, then why did they need to issue a signing statement?" Good question. If the existing law allows the government to open mail in emergencies, why the signing statement??

Link to Signing Statement

Link to H.R. 6407 - Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act
Angeheade is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity