DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**cokLoolioli** · 05-01-2007, 07:37 PM

There is no right to privacy in the constitution, in my opinion. The act of joining with others to gain mutual protection means that you have to give up some freedoms. Its only logical. This is why the constituion does protect the basic right to move freely and choose your leadership. Which is why I do not fear the govt. Once they step out of line they get booted. In addition, the govt is made of AMERICANS, and is run by AMERICAN representatives of AMERICANS, who have the same wish to not return to fascist dictatorships. This is why it is unlikely that the paranoias that everyone fears will ever come true. Everyone watches everyone and is a check on power.

In the end, we still have our guns, and are not shy about using them. So you guys can fear the govt all you want, but I think the real enemy is the terrorists, and that we should do what is neccesary to take them out.

05-01-2007, 07:37 PM	#34
cokLoolioli Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 562 Senior Member	There is no right to privacy in the constitution, in my opinion. The act of joining with others to gain mutual protection means that you have to give up some freedoms. Its only logical. This is why the constituion does protect the basic right to move freely and choose your leadership. Which is why I do not fear the govt. Once they step out of line they get booted. In addition, the govt is made of AMERICANS, and is run by AMERICAN representatives of AMERICANS, who have the same wish to not return to fascist dictatorships. This is why it is unlikely that the paranoias that everyone fears will ever come true. Everyone watches everyone and is a check on power. In the end, we still have our guns, and are not shy about using them. So you guys can fear the govt all you want, but I think the real enemy is the terrorists, and that we should do what is neccesary to take them out.
	Quote