DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**tutkarussia** · 08-09-2011, 03:50 AM

Clearly they felt the risk outweighed the relevance of a $2 trillion dollar math error.

Here's an explanation seemingly from S&P:

S&P Explains Why The "$2 Trillion Error" Is Irrelevant | ZeroHedge

I agree it is irrelevant--when we're talking about 21 trillion in red ink in 10 years.

Clinton spent 432 million a day
G.W. Bush spent 1.6 BILLION a day
Barack Obama is spending 4.3 BILLION dollars a DAY

And then Obama has the audacity--after he was warned over a year ago that this downgrade was imminent--if he didn't stop--to blame everyone else--but himself.

Attachment 11565

08-09-2011, 03:50 AM	#8
tutkarussia Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 378 Senior Member	Clearly they felt the risk outweighed the relevance of a $2 trillion dollar math error. Here's an explanation seemingly from S&P: S&P Explains Why The "$2 Trillion Error" Is Irrelevant \| ZeroHedge I agree it is irrelevant--when we're talking about 21 trillion in red ink in 10 years. Clinton spent 432 million a day G.W. Bush spent 1.6 BILLION a day Barack Obama is spending 4.3 BILLION dollars a DAY And then Obama has the audacity--after he was warned over a year ago that this downgrade was imminent--if he didn't stop--to blame everyone else--but himself. Attachment 11565
	Quote