DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - Bush and Obama administration transferred/released 160+ high-risk detainees

**Mjypksun** · 04-26-2011, 07:19 PM

'Angry men' is an understatement. They're are murderous criminal conspiracy. It already has plenty of sympathiser groups and individuals that pass legal scrutiny, or at least are being given that determination whether they deserve it or not. Take this dangerous asshole for example in the UK, Anjem Choudary, who has been a 'weasel word' agitator for AQ and other extremist force and violence along with his advocacy of Islamic fundamentalism and extremism, including this month's agitations of subtly endorsing that the royal wedding this week be attacked

Anjem Choudary Says Royal Wedding Attractive Target For Al Qaeda - ABC News

and that Obama be killed when he visits his Irish ancestral town of Moneygall shortly thereafter in May:

LexisNexis News - Latest News from over 4,000 sources, including newspapers, tv transcripts, wire services, magazines, journals.

all in addition to generally calling that Ireland be attacked given support for Afghanistan and Iraq, etc.

Jihadist lawyer: Ireland could be targeted - Jihad Watch

But he's the 'weasel word' type when it comes to his extreme advocacies that gets a legal pass (sometimes not appropriately IMO) given how he crafts his words. Even FOX News has had him interviewed along with loads of other media and cable news networks, all of which I find very troubling in making a media sensation out of him and giving him print and airwaves for his advocacies instead of close police scrutiny with immediate arrests for any words that cross a line and where a revival of enacting and/or enforcing sedition laws ought to be given a look given seditious speech is likewise unprotected, even in the US.

Very interesting perspectives, OSB.

Yes, the organization as a whole does have some really really bad people who call for some really horrific things. But, there are also some boys who call themselves AQ because they're lost, have no real options, and AQ provides something at least (kind of like the various street gangs in the US). These kids aren't hardened criminals any more than many of the dumb kids who called themselves "crips" or "bloods" in my high school were. They're just kids looking for some sort of identity, and aren't being given any real options.

Killing these boys, IMHO, isn't a satisfactory answer.

Now, as far as the douchebag calling for the murder of our President? Well, I can't say he deserves to die for his words, either. But does he deserve scrutiny? Yeah.

I mean, think about it OSB. What finally stopped the Troubles? Was it the English killing enough Irish?

04-26-2011, 07:19 PM	#29
Mjypksun Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 468 Senior Member	'Angry men' is an understatement. They're are murderous criminal conspiracy. It already has plenty of sympathiser groups and individuals that pass legal scrutiny, or at least are being given that determination whether they deserve it or not. Take this dangerous asshole for example in the UK, Anjem Choudary, who has been a 'weasel word' agitator for AQ and other extremist force and violence along with his advocacy of Islamic fundamentalism and extremism, including this month's agitations of subtly endorsing that the royal wedding this week be attacked Anjem Choudary Says Royal Wedding Attractive Target For Al Qaeda - ABC News and that Obama be killed when he visits his Irish ancestral town of Moneygall shortly thereafter in May: LexisNexis News - Latest News from over 4,000 sources, including newspapers, tv transcripts, wire services, magazines, journals. all in addition to generally calling that Ireland be attacked given support for Afghanistan and Iraq, etc. Jihadist lawyer: Ireland could be targeted - Jihad Watch But he's the 'weasel word' type when it comes to his extreme advocacies that gets a legal pass (sometimes not appropriately IMO) given how he crafts his words. Even FOX News has had him interviewed along with loads of other media and cable news networks, all of which I find very troubling in making a media sensation out of him and giving him print and airwaves for his advocacies instead of close police scrutiny with immediate arrests for any words that cross a line and where a revival of enacting and/or enforcing sedition laws ought to be given a look given seditious speech is likewise unprotected, even in the US. Very interesting perspectives, OSB. Yes, the organization as a whole does have some really really bad people who call for some really horrific things. But, there are also some boys who call themselves AQ because they're lost, have no real options, and AQ provides something at least (kind of like the various street gangs in the US). These kids aren't hardened criminals any more than many of the dumb kids who called themselves "crips" or "bloods" in my high school were. They're just kids looking for some sort of identity, and aren't being given any real options. Killing these boys, IMHO, isn't a satisfactory answer. Now, as far as the douchebag calling for the murder of our President? Well, I can't say he deserves to die for his words, either. But does he deserve scrutiny? Yeah. I mean, think about it OSB. What finally stopped the Troubles? Was it the English killing enough Irish?
	Quote