DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post - US plans to arm Libyan rebels through Saudi Arabia

**Gozmand** · 11-03-2011, 09:49 PM

Again I concur. The funny thing is now people get mad we don't pursue this type of strategy and intervene.

You must be blind sir.. NO one wants the US to intervene.. Europe doesn't, Italy doesn't, China doesn't, Russia doesn't, the Arab league(which should have the ultimate decision point) doesn't, and several other countries don't want a US led military action.

France asked the US not to act militarily, and demanded to be the only country to strike an attack in Libya. As did the United Kingdom.

Everyone is pressuring to avoid US intervention... no one here is getting "mad" about you not pursuing this type of strategy and intervene.. So where are you getting this impression? Most Americans live with the concept that the US = Awesome, and that because of their economic/financial power, they can afford to stick their noses everywhere. Most of you believe the whole world supports America, but never before has there ever been a radical increase in anti-Americanism.

And your right about China (Tough Vote: Top Countries: Will China overtake the US?), its going to be up to them to start policing all this stuff, and they are not exactly the ones you want to be doing that sort of thing...

The article you listed, only describes the overtake of China in terms of largest economy and Population number, but nothing new or predicted about military technology, or military politics. How can you say that China will adopt the exact same expansion tactic the US has been doing ever since the end of WWII?

And this is the main reason the UN has not passed anything to help Libya as of yet!

It's not that just because Russia said no to a Fly zone, or a military action by the US, that the UN has not done anything to help Libya. The problem is much deeper than that.

11-03-2011, 09:49 PM	#19
Gozmand Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 408 Senior Member	Again I concur. The funny thing is now people get mad we don't pursue this type of strategy and intervene. You must be blind sir.. NO one wants the US to intervene.. Europe doesn't, Italy doesn't, China doesn't, Russia doesn't, the Arab league(which should have the ultimate decision point) doesn't, and several other countries don't want a US led military action. France asked the US not to act militarily, and demanded to be the only country to strike an attack in Libya. As did the United Kingdom. Everyone is pressuring to avoid US intervention... no one here is getting "mad" about you not pursuing this type of strategy and intervene.. So where are you getting this impression? Most Americans live with the concept that the US = Awesome, and that because of their economic/financial power, they can afford to stick their noses everywhere. Most of you believe the whole world supports America, but never before has there ever been a radical increase in anti-Americanism. And your right about China (Tough Vote: Top Countries: Will China overtake the US?), its going to be up to them to start policing all this stuff, and they are not exactly the ones you want to be doing that sort of thing... The article you listed, only describes the overtake of China in terms of largest economy and Population number, but nothing new or predicted about military technology, or military politics. How can you say that China will adopt the exact same expansion tactic the US has been doing ever since the end of WWII? And this is the main reason the UN has not passed anything to help Libya as of yet! It's not that just because Russia said no to a Fly zone, or a military action by the US, that the UN has not done anything to help Libya. The problem is much deeper than that.
	Quote